Publications

Peer-review articles

​

​​

35. Mangiulli, I., Jelicic, M., Howe, M. L., Patihis, L., Dodier, O., Huntjens, R., … & Otgaar, H. (in press). The weight of evidence regarding the nature of traumatic memories: A comment on Mazzoni et al. Legal and Criminological Psychology.

​

34. Krackow, E., Otgaar, H., Huntjens, R., Howe, M. L., Mangiulli, I., Dodier, O., … & Lynn, S. J. (in press). Possible factors associated with increased risk for false memories but decreased convictions in the British False Memory Society data: A comment on Patihis and Felstead. Legal and Criminological Psychology.

​

33. Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Patihis, L., Mangiulli, I., Dodier, O., Huntjens, R., … & Lynn, S. J. (in press). Repressed memory and dissociative amnesia: The unindentified aerial phenomenon of memory loss. Legal and Criminological Psychology.

​

32. Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Patihis, L., Mangiulli, I., Dodier, O., Huntjens, R., … & Lynn, S. J. (in press). The neuroscience of dissociative amnesia and repressed memory: Premature conclusions and unanswered questions. Legal and Criminological Psychology.

​

31. Dodier, O., Otgaar, H., & Mangiulli, I. (2024). Beyond repressed memory: Current alternative solutions to the controversy. Topics in Cognitive Science, 16(4), 574–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12754

​

30. Deferme, D., Otgaar, H., Dodier, O., Körner, A., Mangiulli, I., Merckelbach, H., … & Loftus, E. F. (2024). Repressed memories (of sexual abuse against minors) and statutes of limitations in Europe: Status quo and possible alternatives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 16(4), 630–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12715​​

 

29. Dodier, O., Barzykowski, K., & Souchay, C. (2023). Recovered memories of trauma as a special (or not so special) form of involuntary autobiographical memories. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1268757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1268757

 

28. Dodier, O., Morlet-Rivelli, M., & Verkampt, F. (2023). France lags behind in the application of memory science in the courtroom. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 12(2), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000088

​

27. Battista, F., Mangiulli, I., Patihis, L., Dodier, O., Curci, A., Lanciano, T., & Otgaar, H. (2023). A scientometric and descriptive review on the debate about repressed memories and traumatic forgetting. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 97, 102733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102733

​

26. Otgaar, H., Dodier, O., Garry, M., Howe, M. L., Loftus, E. F., Lynn, S. J., … Patihis, L. (2023). Oversimplifications and misrepresentations in the repressed memory debate: A reply to Ross. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 32(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2022.2133043

​

25. Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., & Dodier, O. (2023). Realistic guidelines on expert witness work concerning memory. Forensic Science International: Mind and Law, 4, 100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiml.2023.100117

​

24. Otgaar, H., Mangiulli, I., Riesthuis, P., Dodier, O., & Patihis, L. (2022). Changing beliefs in repressed memory and dissociative amnesia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(6), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4005

​

23. Dodier, O., Otgaar, H., & Lynn, S. J. (2022). A critical analysis of myths about dissociative identity disorder. Annales Médico-Psychologiques, 180(9), 855–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2021.10.007

​

22. Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., & Dodier, O. (2022). What can expert witnesses reliably say about memory in the courtroom? Forensic Science International: Mind and Law, 3, 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiml.2022.100106

 

21. Dodier, O., Gilet, A.-L., & Colombel, F. (2022). What do people really think of when they claim to believe in repressed memory? Methodological middle ground and applied issues. Memory, 30(6), 744-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1868524

 

20. Tomas, F., Dodier, O., & Demarchi, S. (2022). Computational measures of deceptive language: Prospects and issues. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 792378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.792378

 

19. Dodier, O. (2021). L’amnésie dissociative : Limites méthodologiques, limites conceptuelles, et explications alternatives. L'Année Psychologique/Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 121(3), 275– 309. https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy1.213.0275

 

18. Dodier, O., Ginet, M., Teissedre, F., Verkampt, F., & Fisher, R. P. (2021). Using the cognitive interview to recall real-world emotionally stressful experiences: Road accidents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(4), 1099–1105.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3828

 

17. Dodier, O., & Patihis, L. (2021). Recovered memories of child abuse outside of therapy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3783

 

16. Verkampt, F., Dodier, O., Ginet, M., & Milne, R. (2021). An analysis of the quality of French investigative interviews with children: Age of the witnesses does matter. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 22(2), 1130–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2019.1658581

 

15. Otgaar, H., Howe, M., Dodier, O., Lilienfeld, S. O., Loftus, E. F., Lynn, S. J., Merckelbach, H., & Patihis, L. (2021). Belief in unconscious repressed memory persists. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(2), 454–460. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621990628

 

14. Tomas, F., Dodier, O., Demarchi, S. (2021). Baselining affects the production of deceptive narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3768

 

13. Otgaar, H., Wang, J., Dodier, O., Howe, M. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Loftus, E. F., Lynn, S. J., Merckelbach, H., & Patihis, L. (2020). Skirting the issue: What does believing in repression mean? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(10), 2005–2006. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000982

 

12. Dodier, O., Patihis, L., & Payoux, M. (2019). Reports of recovered memories of childhood abuse in therapy in France. Memory, 27(9), 1283–1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1652654

 

11. Dodier, O., Melinder, A. , Otgaar, H., Payoux, M., & Magnussen, S. (2019). Psychologists and psychiatrists in court: What do they know about eyewitness memory? A comparison of experts in inquisitorial and adversarial legal systems. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34(3), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09339-0

 

10. Dodier, O., & Otgaar, H. (2019). The forensic and clinical relevance of evidence-based investigative interview methods in historical sexual abuse cases. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(6), 1244–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619858287

 

9. Dodier, O. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the recovered-memory controversy in the 21st Century. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(4), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3498

 

8. Dodier, O., & Tomas, F. (2019). When psychological science fails to be heard: The lack of evidence-based arguments in a ministerial report on child sexual abuse. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 26(3), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1506716

 

7. Dodier, O., Tomas, F., Payoux, M., & Elissalde, B. (2019). Professional experience in investigative interviews does not ensure strong knowledge about memory. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 2(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v2i1.49

 

6. Ginet, M., Dodier, O., Bardin, B., Désert, M., Greffeuille, C., & Verkampt, F. (2018). Perspective effects on recall in a testimony paradigm. Journal of General Psychology, 145(4), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2018.1494126

 

5. Dodier, O. (2018). The need for memory experts in French courts. Journal of Forensic Psychology: Research and Practice, 18(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2018.1444912

 

4. Dodier, O., & Denault, V. (2018). The Griffiths Question Map: A forensic tool for expert witnesses’ assessments of witnesses and victims’ statements. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 63(1), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13477

 

3. Dodier, O., & Payoux, M. (2017). Connaissances et croyances des psychologues et psychiatres experts judiciaires concernant le fonctionnement de la mémoire. L’Année Psychologique/Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 117(2), 139–171. https://doi.org/10.4074/s0003503317000483

 

2. Denault, V., Jupe, L., Dodier, O., & Rochat, N. (2017). To veil or not to veil, detecting lies in the courtroom: A comment on Leach et al. (2016). Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1260619

 

1. van Can, S., Dodier, O., Otgaar, H., & Verkampt, F. (2016). The benefits of multiple recollection strategies on adolescents’ testimonies: Quality versus within-statement consistency? Journal of Forensic Practice, 18, 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-01-2015-0007